I tried to make some sense of it, but i failed. Threads lost the plot.It seems to me that there's a whole bunch of people in this thread trying to make out like they know what they're chatting about, but getting most of it horribly wrong......
I generally have my basses around 11000hz
I try to get my bass to sit within 100 (or 200) Hz and 2,000 Hz (maybe 2,400 Hz, if I'm feeling it). I use EQ to "enforce" this restriction, stopping the bass from clashing with the leads. The sub (< 100 Hz) is for the kick, and 2,000-18,000 Hz is for the leads. Sometimes, I split the bass into 100-600 Hz, and 600-2000 Hz, either doubled up playing the same notes, or as separate parts.
I've found this wide range makes for basses that are both deep, and also clear/audible (especially on lower-end systems). I don't pretend to know the "right" answer, though.
Does anyone else share this approach? Does anyone target bass frequencies differently? If so, how come?
Right, I wasn't going to, but I feel the need to weigh in on this....
Having a sub hit at around 20hz is absolutely pointless as most systems don't register anything below 30hz, and even then, it's only the more top end systems that will register that low! And as for not ever going over 70hz or whatever it was you're all talking about, well....that's absurd also! When creating tracks you need to consider what people will be listening on. Sure, you'd like to think your tracks will get played out in clubs, but the reality of it is that it will mostly be heard by your average Joe listener, most likely through a general home stereo or a pair of iPod earbuds! Out of curiosity, have you actually tried listening to a sub through earbuds that only runs at 20-70hz? it's inaudible! By pushing up a little higher (say around 80 - 100hz ) you are giving enough harmonics to be heard on most systems, without compromising the mix. Kicks should be low cut at around the 80hz mark, unless you are writing house music in which case they can sit lower as it's typically the kick that gives the bass in this genre. I tend to give a small boost at around 130hz for the kick.
But back to the topic in question, there is no right or wrong when it comes to frequency splitting, and don't stick to the same rule you decided on about 6 tracks back, it all depends what style of track you are producing, what type of bass your are trying to create, what drum samples you are using etc etc.
I think a couple of you in here need to step back and actually think about what you are saying as there is some serious false info in here that would confuse the hell out of any new producers.
^TRUTH.
Fletch's post should appear second in this thread in response to the OP's question because it's simple, cohesive and works. I have no PhD or major record deals, but I (and I'm sure many others) can vouch to the above approach as being a great starting point.
Once upon a time before the age of wiki, forums, the interwebz and easy to obtain spectrum analyzers, producers relied on primitive tools known as ears. Facts, figures, ratios, graphs, charts, theorems, etc. are all fine & dandy...but dwelling on such things and/or using them as a concrete guide for every tune you produce is a guaranteed recipe for frustration...that goes double for new producers. Understand the absolute primitive basics and start creating whilst tweaking as you see fit to help develop your signature sound.
Cheers.
1 - But Why would you ever want to hear the bass?!
2- I make music for a proffesional sound system to play it perfectly. Idc if it sounds "bad" to the user on Ipod Earbuds... Its Earbuds.... Its a bassless sound player... Which is perfectly fine to listen to but cmon, its not like its some crazy sound system in a room or club, and I still dont and wont understand why anyone would make your sub so you can actually hear it..
Yeah man I think you kinda misunderstand the point here.
Listen to any commercial track, whatever genre really, doesn't matter, through earbuds. you'll still be able to hear the sub bass, although due to the size of the earbuds you wont feel it. Play the same track through a monster sound system and you'll be able to feel it! By hearing it on a small system you know it's there, perceiving the bass sound makes the track subconsciously complete. If you were not to hear it, then it would sound poor and unfinished.
Also I'd like to reiterate a previous point that I made, YOU should care who listens to it on earbuds.......as 90% of your listeners / fans etc will be listening to it on that kinda system! A track wont instantly get played in a banging club without the DJ and probably a few of his pals listening to it first, which will probably be done on headphones, car stereo, studio, EARBUDS etc. If it doesn't sound polished, they aren't gonna play it!
Well, I'm a beginner in a bedroom so I'm already on shaky ground, but does it help to do the "wall" test? You know, put your hand on the wall and see if you can feel the sub resonating through it?Yeah man I think you kinda misunderstand the point here.
Listen to any commercial track, whatever genre really, doesn't matter, through earbuds. you'll still be able to hear the sub bass, although due to the size of the earbuds you wont feel it. Play the same track through a monster sound system and you'll be able to feel it! By hearing it on a small system you know it's there, perceiving the bass sound makes the track subconsciously complete. If you were not to hear it, then it would sound poor and unfinished.
Also I'd like to reiterate a previous point that I made, YOU should care who listens to it on earbuds.......as 90% of your listeners / fans etc will be listening to it on that kinda system! A track wont instantly get played in a banging club without the DJ and probably a few of his pals listening to it first, which will probably be done on headphones, car stereo, studio, EARBUDS etc. If it doesn't sound polished, they aren't gonna play it!
Try some Jeremy Slyvester tracks and you'll think otherwise. Such as this one:honestly having the only sub-bass in a track be the kick is boring to me. Which is one of the reasons why I hate House music, I love sub-bass so much, it's one of my favorite elements and restricting it to only the kick is horrid to me.
Fletch and Cartel got it spot on.
Going slightly off topic, but is there a way to high-pass kicks/bass and other stuff without increasing the peaks? Even my linear phase EQ raises the peaks quite a bit with any slope steeper than 24db/o
I know exactly what you mean.
To tame those peaks, you can try a 12db or 6db slope. If you need that 24db slope, simply lower the EQ's gain slightly.
Any reason in particular why you're using a linear phase EQ over a simple channel EQ? Just curious.
My subs are pure sines, they never go above 80hz (main note is always much lower, 36hz being my favorite), except maybe briefly on a big pitch bend (rarely tho, and the sub is always low-pass @ 100hz so theres not to much of a spike on bends)
Mid bass I keep above 100hz-120hz, between 100hz-200hz I EQ so that there is just what is needed to fill the space around the Kick and the Snare
everything else gets balanced as required
i cut everything at 35hz, my sub lying in between there and 100, my kick lying from about 80-180 with a pop at 500hz and 2khz mid bass is about 500hz
obviously there are clashes in frequency but side chain the kick and sub - i read the mix engineers handbook and very interest note was compression should "breathe" with the track and you get a nice pump action
also some surgical eqing opposite the peaks - so my peak kick say 90 then i take a savage thin dip on the sub at 90