That wad to update the k2t dummy track and bhk track, not a rule.
I'm sorry I fail to see the rule change within the circle. Also, did you know that typing in a bigger font makes your writing seem smarter.
But on that page you can see that the judges will judge the winners by style.
Dude, you are fine. I think just a couple of guys are feeling insecure about their tracks. These compos here are all about the fun, learning, and sharing. Not for pointless bickering about things that do not matter.
That was a funny joke
That wad to update the k2t dummy track and bhk track, not a rule.
I'm sorry I fail to see the rule change within the circle. Also, did you know that typing in a bigger font makes your writing seem smarter.
But on that page you can see that the judges will judge the winners by style.
Dude, you are fine. I think just a couple of guys are feeling insecure about their tracks. These compos here are all about the fun, learning, and sharing. Not for pointless bickering about things that do not matter.
Magnificant competition here, too bad I couldn't join in. But just left my 2 votes.
As I didn't join and can be fully independent in my review:
In my opinion, the critique about intelligent or not is justified with a number of submissions ...
@ comp boss: you could rename the vote into "Select 2 submissions that sound most Intelligent DnB alike to you"
instead of "Vote for your favourite two tracks"
Cheers from Rotterdam, Lucas
Some of these are really good. Can someone explain to me the difference between liquid and intelligent? One is modern and chill and one is jazzier and chill? Which one would you consider Mr Happy to be?
Not an easy task this one for the judges because this particular style can be interpreted in many ways.
I'm not stating what I think is right here, just my fairly loose opinion of it all... But I think originality of track and production quality would be enough.. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think if it is that intelligent sound it should stand out as having some originality, rather than a simple, unimaginative drum pattern and bassline?@EvezDroppin @logikz @Dark Lizardro
Shall we have 3 judging categories ranked out of 10 for how close it is to the original intelligent sound, originality of track and production quality?
I'm not stating what I think is right here, just my fairly loose opinion of it all... But I think originality of track and production quality would be enough.. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think if it is that intelligent sound it should stand out as having some originality, rather than a simple, unimaginative drum pattern and bassline?
To be clear, I'm not really sure Steve...
I had so much fun with the project and I’ve learned a thing or two along the way. Now I’m more comfortable and probably prefer working with audio rather than midi. I never expected to score with it being my first upload and all I really want to gain is some feedback and advice for future projects.
Then stick with that. I'm sure your track is fine and we would love to hear how you made the bits and pieces of it, and everybody is happy to have you here.Mate, of course, we all had fun.
Is intelligent drum and bass the same as intelliegent jungle?
Liquid and intelligent are both sub genres of dnb and overlap quite a bit.
Intelligent was renamed liquid (intelligent was not an appreciated sub genre name specially not by the jump up crowd, it really had to be changed so with fabios compilation cd 'liquid funk' the restyled sub genre took its first baby steps.
You see another aspect of intelligent dnb breaking off into a separate sub genre too, I. E drumfunk ) like techstep was renamed neurofunk (don't know why they did that).
Sort of, there is a clear difference in the later stuff, but early stuff is indistinguishable. This compo however is about the intelligent side of things, and calibre is a liquid king for example but he retains tons of intelligence in his sound.
Is intelligent drum and bass the same as intelliegent jungle?