right, as mentioned above we were discussing the difference of:
youngsters using lots of samples trying to get signed vs. established producers making great tunes using some samples.
see the difference?
You've destroyed your own point here. I said earlier that all it's all about the engineering of the samples used in my opinion, to which you told me that I won't get tunes signed using samples.
Trust me, I work for a leading sample pack creation company and we get tipped off all the time as to big producer's tunes that use our samples. It's commonplace and the reason why sample packs are created - to give producers creativity. They work a treat. Like RUSSLA said, the only people that seem to care are the producers that haven't got stuff signed!
Still can't believe I'm continuing this charade of a thread but I feel your points are too silly to ignore. Not insulting you at all though, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Just don't try to enforce your opinion as the law of the land by insulting others!
But i think ultimately it is just a preference for people ... Still a lot can be done to improve sample aswell with various FX.
It's to do with control.
It's to do with control.
If you use a loop, you can't control the positions of the drums in the loop if you don't like them.
If you use samples, you can't get as good a control over the way the drums were played, if you don't like that- but the way you hit a drum doesn't make that much difference to the sound really anyway, which is why people use samples.
If you play your own brought drums you don't have control of the way different skins sound, but you'd have to be really really fussy to care about the difference in sound between different drum skins.
I can't imagine using your own personal method of raising goats actually translates into control of the drum skin and sound.
Lol bit of both... I don't think there's actually anyone considering goat farming to improve their dnb they make.Can't tell if you're playing along with the joke or you genuinely took that seriously.
just heard this on his forthcoming podcast and i can confirm this is legitYou heard it here first boys every artist on Hospital mics up all of their own drums
I do get what your saying but you can always make it your own sample though, A lot of times a sampled kick will be unrecognisable by the time I'm finishedReally? I doubt it! Labels would cut into their own flesh signing producers using too many samples because IT'S NOT ORIGINAL !!
I give one example: Tony @Hospital emphasises in very artist interview (i.e. on the podcast) NOT to use any purchased samples and to make your own instead.
If you know better pls give examples with artist/record, label, sample, sampler library you found being released on serious labels ..
PS: I agree good vibe & sound quality are also very important, but use of purchased samples is a no-go for most labels.
I do get what your saying but you can always make it your own sample though, A lot of times a sampled kick will be unrecognisable by the time I'm finished
Thanks!yep, fully agree. as smoothassilk says the topic is more about loops than single hit samples.
nice tunes on your SC by the way ...
That drum fill at 42 seconds has been lifted straight out of the Villem sample pack, with virtually no processing. So obviously Tony does sign tracks with samples in them. And I don't think there's anything wrong with that at all.
Frankly I can't believe you actually think that established producers can't make original sounding tracks with sample packs. I'm clearly not going to convince you otherwise so I'm going to leave it there lol, obviously you are entitlted to your opinion.