2Bad said:Nah 2Bad as in Johnny 2 Bad (is a reggae song)
1992 as in?? (I really have to know this now as it has dragged on so long ... LOL!!)
[/b]2Bad said:They can keep their white gloves and glow sticks to them selves .... YES the old skool was good but YES the scene is good now.
I still listen to stuff now like Moving Shadow 004 (2 Bad Mice - 2 Bad Mice / No Respect), old Sub Base Tunes, old Tone Def stuff and I still really like those tracks but you can't compare it to todays music ... *snip*
*Snip*
Oh I don't know ... I'd say happy hardcore was the worse thing to happen to the scene (sorry Stuuu - I know you are trying to banish those distant memories by flogging your dodgy Dougal and Vibes collection ! LOL!!). Had to get that dig in ... LOL!!
*snip*
Thats my worth there I think! I'll shut up now!
1992 said:For a guy whos name is "2 Bad Mice" you sure seem to hate the golden age of dance music.
I agree thereOriginally posted by 2Bad
I never said the music from those days was shit I said it is totally different to what is is now.
But Im gonna have to disagree there, I too prefer the older stuff, to me, its better, i'd rather listen to 95-98 DnB over the new stuff, like you said to 1992, im not saying its shit, its merely what I preferThere is no way you can say the music back then was better because it has over the years transformed itself into something else which is what has kept the scene alive ....
Talking on old skool hardcore, new technology is IMO to blame for some of the wank lets call it 'nu-skool' that is coming out, it aint got that 1992 (or 91, or 93 for that matter lol) vibe to it, because, its being written on more advanced technology, the old skool has a certain touch, that new technology today just cant seem to replicate, for me personally, its just not the same vibeAlso how can the older music be better in terms of prodution and stuff when technology has advanced the music so far??
Originally posted by logikz
basically you can compare apples and oranges too and youre perfectly free to think which ever is better but fact remains youre still comparing apples and oranges.
wrong wrong wrong, breaming with wrongabilityAnd the supply of oldskool tunes is limited where as the modern dnb (and nu skool) definitely isnt. Means itsa dying form
you have just made a prime example on my whole point, whats better depends on personal opinion, I could argue with you till someone can ice skate uphill whats the better, and we'd never agreelike 2bad said, oldskool is classic material and i wouldnt diss it for the world. But its got nothing on the modern sound.
its defined by genre, what we're talking about, dnb, and /or old skool hardcorebesides the modern sound what ever that is is so diverse right now that it cant be definded by one sound.
it was intelligent for its time, look at Dread Bass, labelled a classic in the DnB scene, it was the first tune to use reversed bass...like 2bad pointed out, technology has advanced...which oldskool can in two words, amen and sub. Ive got loads of oldskool jungle compilations, almost 9 hours worth of playtime and its fun to listen to and all that. Isnt very intelligent music tho.
yeh, i never said I dont like any new dnb tune out, ska is a good tune i love to play, I could also list a few more..If you all take a real deep dive im sure that youll find at least one tune or one artists (or even a whole style, who knows) somewhere to tickle your fancy.
...which oldskool can in two words, amen and sub. Ive got loads of oldskool jungle compilations, almost 9 hours worth of playtime and its fun to listen to and all that. Isnt very intelligent music tho.
DJ Destiny said:If anything, the limited equipment ment the tunes had ALOT more thought and originality put into them. Every tune was totally different from the next.
Where as now, 99% of all dnb that comes out is totally bland crap. Take Dillinja for example, you can all spot one of his tunes from a mile off, why? Cause its always the same tedious drums and distorted bass. Boring.
2Bad said:Dillinjas sound has become recognisable because he has built up a style as have many oter artists .... such as Bad Company, most of the Ram crew, Photek, Alex Reece, Digital, Total Science, Calibre .... etc .... etc!
Most definately! but Im just not seeing that enough lately2Bad said:True, but when people do build up a certain style it's always cool when they surprise you with something totally off the wall!!
Thats where the artists fuck up, they fit themselves into their own style, then find it very hard to break out of it to try something new, so the scene stays the same, and no diversity happens (or if it does, it takes a fuckin age to get it anywhere)When Dillinja did Nasty Ways there was this big thing about using vocals in D&B - I mean where is the problem in that?? I couldn't see one and it wasn't as if it was the first time it had been done but it seems to have been more accepted now.
Im one that aint too worried, Shake Ur Body has started to be questioned if its even DnB or not, I think some will explore the scene a bit more after hearing it, but as its quite a, dare i say "commercial" tune, I dont think DnB offers what they're looking for, and they'll soon look for something else inspiring (the next Fragma tune most likely )Seems so funny - people are all worried when something like that happens but Shake Ur Body has vocals, a bloody video and is without a doubt going to storm the charts and nobody seems worried!
I still think the scene is underground, everyone loves ska, its been caned everywhere, but unlike bodyrock and shake ur body, in the commercial world, its just unheard ofPersonally I think there is another re-invention coming along anyway. Hopefully we'll go through another "dark" era to take it all back underground again!
Sassy said:I think the scene is safe