What is your quality preference for mp3 sets?

Discussion in 'Drum & Bass' started by jay walker, Jul 29, 2004.

?

What quality of MP3 is your preffered choice, taking webspace into consideration?

  1. 45 minute session @ 320kbs - All about the crystal quality, not quantity innit!

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 60 minute session @ 192kbs - Something that can be burnt to CD an sound phat in the car

    8 vote(s)
    66.7%
  3. 90 minutes @ 128kbs - Good quality, healthy selection of tunes - a good balance.

    3 vote(s)
    25.0%
  4. 120 minutes @ 96kbs - sounds wack, but 40 - 50 tracks in the mix, Boh

    1 vote(s)
    8.3%
  5. who cares? all sounds the same to me!

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. jay walker

    jay walker 1/2 of Passive/Aggressive

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    3,889
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    between a rock and a hard place, Hants
    Been having a proper think about this the last month or so, an as I want the Risque Business Radio archives to peoples preference of quality - what ever gets the highest vote will be what gets encoded.

    and you cant have 2 hour show @ 320kbs! :teeth:
     
  2. sdm

    sdm This is Dog Fort

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2001
    Messages:
    12,757
    Likes Received:
    17
    --alt preset standard (y)
     
  3. jay walker

    jay walker 1/2 of Passive/Aggressive

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    3,889
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    between a rock and a hard place, Hants
    what you mean, sir - what the preset standard? am i being a stoned eejut again? :shake:
     
  4. sdm

    sdm This is Dog Fort

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2001
    Messages:
    12,757
    Likes Received:
    17
    It's the coolest way to encode MP3's don't ya know!

    Some info here: http://www.cdfreaks.com/article/63
     
  5. mesh

    mesh Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,414
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    INSIDE
    I voted for 60 mins at 192, altho usually happy with 90mins at 128

    yep



    :devilslay
     
  6. 1992

    1992 Novantadue

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,280
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    NJ
    NONE OF THE ABOVE!

    79 minutes @ 192kbps for a mix.
     
  7. jay walker

    jay walker 1/2 of Passive/Aggressive

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    3,889
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    between a rock and a hard place, Hants
    Ah hah, this is what VBR is, must agree the quality on these are proper bo :devilslay
     
  8. sdm

    sdm This is Dog Fort

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2001
    Messages:
    12,757
    Likes Received:
    17
    Fo' shizzle, VBR business (y)
     
  9. 1992

    1992 Novantadue

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,280
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    NJ
    I'm not a supporter of VBR. I like stability in my mp3s.
     
  10. NaS

    NaS Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    0
    24kbps :monkey: just messing lol

    128kbps or 192kbps out of them :afro:
     
  11. jay walker

    jay walker 1/2 of Passive/Aggressive

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    3,889
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    between a rock and a hard place, Hants
    Cheers for the votes so far guys, need a few more for conclusive results :pimp:
     
  12. elitejungalist

    elitejungalist Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    wolves, england
    60 mins at 192k, usually sounds nice.
     
  13. merge

    merge Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2002
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Oxford UK
    Lets have it! :2thumbs:
     
  14. DjEffect

    DjEffect lethaleffect.co.uk

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2003
    Messages:
    397
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    UK / Belgium
    s'all about the 60mins @ 192 bro ;)