War with Sadam

What do you think we should do

  • bomb sadam now

    Votes: 5 25.0%
  • wait for inspectors to finish

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • leave sadam aloan

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • join sadam

    Votes: 3 15.0%

  • Total voters
    20
Messages
169
Likes
0
#2
...or what we cud do is get him to destroy all his weapons and then in a few years sell him sum more n then a few years after that we can get him to destroy them and the process can then continue for an infinite amount of time.........

soundz like it makes about as much sense as tony blair n george bush do.....
 

sampa

ShadowSniper
Messages
356
Likes
1
#3
I think they should all sit down for tea and discuss their different ideologies in a peaceful manner over a nice, warm, plate of crumpets. Then perhaps Sadam, president Tony and George could see that all it takes is a cup of PG tips to sort life's little hiccups out and from then on It'll be world peace. :> because after all Britain and America are the only important countries in the world? aren't they:-/
 
Last edited:

D BREAKNECK

7 years on top
VIP Junglist
Messages
1,977
Likes
7
#4
Let's just hope Tony B has his breakdown on live TV (nearly happened last night!), and war is miracurously averted!

Cruel but fair I think...
 

RJM

Member
Messages
155
Likes
0
#5
All the women in iraq have shaved off their pubic hair and are going out to protest........
Their plackards say....
"read our lips. no more bush!"
 

kama

benkama.net
VIP Junglist
Messages
2,767
Likes
48
#8
yeah but after the un leaves the premises, US are going to attack anyway. it's a clever strategy, first disarm your opponent via humanitarian routes and then attack. like taking a candy from a baby.

FUCK 0Ff 4LL W4R!!
 

DJ-Fear

New Member
Messages
14
Likes
0
#9
the term 'war' generally implies that there are two armies fighting. don't let yourselves be fooled into thinking that iraq poses any threat to us whatsoever! this so called 'war' is probably going to end up as a massacre of innocent civilians, just like in kosovo only worse
 

CoB

Pure Sanelessness
VIP Junglist
Messages
948
Likes
33
#10
oh, but this is a "war for peace"
its the bigest oxymoron..
but i guess you cant get any more of an oxymoron than George W can you?
 

D BREAKNECK

7 years on top
VIP Junglist
Messages
1,977
Likes
7
#12
Originally posted by DJ-Fear
the term 'war' generally implies that there are two armies fighting. don't let yourselves be fooled into thinking that iraq poses any threat to us whatsoever! this so called 'war' is probably going to end up as a massacre of innocent civilians, just like in kosovo only worse
This ain't war it's mass murder, 800,000 civilians deas (UN figures).

Peace On Earth.

:burn:
 

kama

benkama.net
VIP Junglist
Messages
2,767
Likes
48
#13
and when those 1000 us troops get killed, its a tragedy.

but when those 800 000 iraq civilians are killed, its "fighting for what's right".
 

RJM

Member
Messages
155
Likes
0
#15
We should leave it to the Americans.......
weve got enuff problems on these shores anyways......
Blair should try and improve the Uk not destroy Iraq, we have sooooo many asylum seekers comin in that in 10 years time we are gonna be massively overcrowded..

rant
rant
rant
 

wasp

gamorah sound
Messages
99
Likes
0
#16
Apparently some countries can do whatever they please... the hell with all international agreements and UN and NATO...

:nuke:

Maybe they can resolve all their problems like this in the future:

- Illegal imigrants from Mexico? ----> just nuke mexico :nuke:
- Damn, those British have a better accent then us ----> :nuke:

(I'm joking of course...)


:shake:
 
Top