War with Sadam

Discussion in 'Waffle' started by Sed, Mar 8, 2003.

?

What do you think we should do

  1. bomb sadam now

    5 vote(s)
    25.0%
  2. wait for inspectors to finish

    6 vote(s)
    30.0%
  3. leave sadam aloan

    6 vote(s)
    30.0%
  4. join sadam

    3 vote(s)
    15.0%
  1. Sed

    Sed jungleravers.com

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    worldwide
    who wants to bomb sadam?
     
  2. sub vibes

    sub vibes Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chichester
    ...or what we cud do is get him to destroy all his weapons and then in a few years sell him sum more n then a few years after that we can get him to destroy them and the process can then continue for an infinite amount of time.........

    soundz like it makes about as much sense as tony blair n george bush do.....
     
  3. sampa

    sampa ShadowSniper

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pecknarm SE15
    I think they should all sit down for tea and discuss their different ideologies in a peaceful manner over a nice, warm, plate of crumpets. Then perhaps Sadam, president Tony and George could see that all it takes is a cup of PG tips to sort life's little hiccups out and from then on It'll be world peace. :> because after all Britain and America are the only important countries in the world? aren't they:-/
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2003
  4. D BREAKNECK

    D BREAKNECK 7 years on top

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Messages:
    1,978
    Likes Received:
    7
    Let's just hope Tony B has his breakdown on live TV (nearly happened last night!), and war is miracurously averted!

    Cruel but fair I think...
     
  5. RJM

    RJM Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2002
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sunny Portsmouth
    All the women in iraq have shaved off their pubic hair and are going out to protest........
    Their plackards say....
    "read our lips. no more bush!"
     
  6. sampa

    sampa ShadowSniper

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pecknarm SE15
    Sick:thumbsup:
     
  7. RasDisOne

    RasDisOne Uranium Cranium

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
    war is never an acceptable answer
    sorry dudes, let the UN do their job
    they're there for a damn good reason
     
  8. kama

    kama benkama.net

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,768
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Halfway between the gutter and stars
    yeah but after the un leaves the premises, US are going to attack anyway. it's a clever strategy, first disarm your opponent via humanitarian routes and then attack. like taking a candy from a baby.

    FUCK 0Ff 4LL W4R!!
     
  9. DJ-Fear

    DJ-Fear New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2003
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    the term 'war' generally implies that there are two armies fighting. don't let yourselves be fooled into thinking that iraq poses any threat to us whatsoever! this so called 'war' is probably going to end up as a massacre of innocent civilians, just like in kosovo only worse
     
  10. CoB

    CoB Pure Sanelessness

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    A, A
    oh, but this is a "war for peace"
    its the bigest oxymoron..
    but i guess you cant get any more of an oxymoron than George W can you?
     
  11. HEIST

    HEIST Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Essex UK
    mate - if we dont do something about saddam soon - it will be too late- hes gotta die man- bastard
     
  12. D BREAKNECK

    D BREAKNECK 7 years on top

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Messages:
    1,978
    Likes Received:
    7
    This ain't war it's mass murder, 800,000 civilians deas (UN figures).

    Peace On Earth.

    :burn:
     
  13. kama

    kama benkama.net

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,768
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Halfway between the gutter and stars
    and when those 1000 us troops get killed, its a tragedy.

    but when those 800 000 iraq civilians are killed, its "fighting for what's right".
     
  14. skope

    skope promoti0nal.douchbag

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2002
    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    bognor regis yo'
    fuct dup.:mad:
     
  15. RJM

    RJM Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2002
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sunny Portsmouth
    We should leave it to the Americans.......
    weve got enuff problems on these shores anyways......
    Blair should try and improve the Uk not destroy Iraq, we have sooooo many asylum seekers comin in that in 10 years time we are gonna be massively overcrowded..

    rant
    rant
    rant
     
  16. wasp

    wasp gamorah sound

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Event Horizon
    Apparently some countries can do whatever they please... the hell with all international agreements and UN and NATO...

    :nuke:

    Maybe they can resolve all their problems like this in the future:

    - Illegal imigrants from Mexico? ----> just nuke mexico :nuke:
    - Damn, those British have a better accent then us ----> :nuke:

    (I'm joking of course...)


    :shake:
     
  17. kama

    kama benkama.net

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,768
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Halfway between the gutter and stars
    A bit harsh view, but might be close to truth in the next couple of decades...
     
  18. ZESTOI

    ZESTOI time for heroes.

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2002
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    POMPEY!
    :cry: I don't like war!