captusrave
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2010
Its called sampling mate.
And your grammar is questionable - your title infers that someone else is plagiarising SF's work when infact you are accusing him of plagiarism.
Its called sampling mate.
And your grammar is questionable - your title infers that someone else is plagiarising SF's work when infact you are accusing him of plagiarism.
he does kinda take it pretty far but still almost every artist has done it in some shape or form.
If your "argument" is true, then the same should apply for this.
But no it isnt. For many songs off his album, hes even said this himself, he had to recreate the samples himself from scratch. Hench why they all sound so similar. Theres an interview with him somewhere on the net where he says this.
Is there even such a thing in music as plagiarism?
(Unless you take a track of someones, slap your name on it and try to release it.)
---------- Post added at 13:16 ---------- Previous post was at 13:15 ----------
Also, last jungle is signifcantly better. Last Jungle was my favourite track off the album which wasn't just a rereleased tune with added vocals
If your "argument" is true, then the same should apply for this.
But no it isnt. For many songs off his album, hes even said this himself, he had to recreate the samples himself from scratch. Hench why they all sound so similar. Theres an interview with him somewhere on the net where he says this.
Some good arguments here. If you listen to Subfocus B2B Friction from Pirate Station 2008, the original edit of Let The Story Begin has this EXACT same intro. Is it a case of RAM couldnt get sample clearance?
yeah fairplay subfocus does make fat tracks but personally i wouldnt be comfortable using that much material from other artists probably i would prefer to be more original but its all fairplay to him and he does make better tracks than the ones before no doubt