Hes a mormon, so.. you know.. he believes some guy got told by god to write new sections of the bible on gold slates or someshit - DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM
No abortion, no gay-marriage, no medical marijuana, free guns for everyone, I do what Im told to by Israel, spend more to get america out of this recession, Obamacare is shit. Basically he wants to turn America even more backward than it already is. If he wins the world is fucked. Although the world did survive Bush (for 2 terms.. cheers..), so the question is, is he worse?
And finally, its pretty much tradition as a presidential candidate to reveal all your tax returns to show youre being honest and stuff. Well, he refuses to show all of his tax returns before 2010. Trustworthy guy then? NOPE - Hes the biggest flip-flopping politician I have ever seen:
bit harsh.. i know people in north america. anyways, if hes that evil..... then maybe....
Pentagon’s 30,000-pound bunker-buster ‘superbomb’ ready for use
The biggest conventional bomb ever developed is ready to wreak destruction upon the enemies of the US, after Air Force Secretary Michael Donley said its record-breaking bunker-buster has become operational after years of testing.
*“If it needed to go today, we would be ready to do that,” said Donley. “We continue to do testing on the bomb to refine its capabilities, and that is ongoing. We also have the capability to go with existing configuration today.”
US/NATO/Israel attack on Iran would be a catastrophe for everyone - Bill Ayers
US wars of “invasion, aggression and occupation” are no longer sustainable economically and socially, veteran war critic and US scholar Professor Bill Ayers told RT. He adds that if NATO, the US or Israel attack Iran, it would lead to a catastrophe.
*The activist says America has an old colonial mentality and grotesque double standards. Washington is frantic about the possibility that Iran might have a nuclear warhead someday – but not frantic about the fact that Israel, as Ayers says, is the third-largest nuclear power in the world. And it is not part of nuclear non-proliferation treaty, or even admits to having the weapons.
Ayers is part of the Occupy Wall Street movement, which he says has a growing “anti-war energy.”
this shows why party politics is irrelevant, not really worth wasting your time this american presidency race imo now that ron paul is out. and yes before anyone starts i am one of those paranoid conspiracy theory believers, well up to a point i am and i don't think they're that evil just greedy fuckers who shit on us.
No he is not.
He is a politician from the U.S. who will say or do anything to get elected. They are all like that.
He needs to appeal to an American conservative base that believes in God, War, and capitalism. Right now while he is running he will be super in to those things. If he gets elected he will be not much different than Brock Obama.
For instance he was one of the first politicians to get the ball running on universal health care. He can't admit that right now because he needs to appel to his anti-socialist base, but it is true.
When it comes to American politics you really are voting for two things. Trickle down theory or trickle down theory. We are fucked. The only reason why the democrats seem to do better with economy is because they need to appel to the middle class and corporations that need a strong middle class to survive. Well that is sometimes true.
Shit! dumbing down politics is hard. Mostly because it is so stupid in the first place.
We are a country that has politicians that make policies that only the rich enjoy. We as a nation could over turn these bastards. But we are to apathetic. Bread and circuses my friends.
well the BBC don't seem impartial anymore, there was a report today about syria, saying the rebels have a safe haven in turkey.. i thought, well thats like the taliban in pakistan really... you can't trust any news these days.. so i read whats simply intresting.. which is rt.com. other end of the spectrum.
Yea. He's been in the run the entire time. The media stopped coverage of him because of his idea's on freedom and less government being present in area's of society. He was more freedom and against war especially with what was going on in the middle east. He may sound like a hippie but he really is the only candidate I have ever payed attention to since George Bush ran.
People will always disagree with me on this but hey. Its just how it is....In my view Ron Paul is the best out of a bad situation.
Edit: Just a debate vid. Its not indepth as others but I doubt any of you will want to sit and watch youtube for a solid 2 hours
The fact that the media has backed out tells you something doesn't it?
Future of the western world? America may be a big influence but that doesn't mean it will define our future.
Sooo, What does age have to do with it? Every politician has said the same bullshit when it comes to the election and yet nobody notices it when they completely change their ways as soon as they enter office?
Sheeple comes to mind.
Edit: thought I might add though. As a kiwi ive been following the elections since I was younger considering I know how america can influence the world. As I said man, Ron Paul to me is the best out of a bad situation. He has been saying the same thing since 2002 so in my view he is an exception to changing his views if her ever got in office. In saying that though, ya never know man.