vinyl is gorgeous, don't get me wrong, but let's not be seduced by the history of the art, lets embrace the future.
You can argue however much you like about the antiquity of vinyl and how the digital era is coming in and how it's obselete etc etc etc.
Bottom line is though, vinyl is the only medium in which the ART of mixing (and it is an art) is fully on display.
Think about it, when you go and see a DJ, you're not just going along to listen to the phat tunes, your going to watch him in his element, and how he does what he does. You go to admire his skill (or not, if they suck ) and enjoy the experience of watching him at his craft.
I would argue that that feeling is lost when digital mediums are involved. It cheapens the entire process. It removes the sense of skill from the DJ, because that entire time you're thinking "a nutless monkey could do this". And in all honesty they probably could.
Sure, we pay an extortionate amount of money to keep what is essentially an archaic format alive, but without it dnb, no in fact most underground music would lose a great deal of its appeal.
It's not the history of art that seduces us my friend, it is the idea of art. And whether you care to admit it or not, digital technology only contributes to the suppression of that idea.
It's not the history of art that seduces us my friend, it is the idea of art. And whether you care to admit it or not, digital technology only contributes to the suppression of that idea.
how? if anything digital technology enhances that art and has bought something new to it. it offers djs more versatility and more creativity. without digital technology we wouldn't have fx on mixers, or things like serato scratch. saying digital technology suppresses the art is a bit narrow minded really and there is no difference in the art between cd decks or vinyl decks. just remember it's not vinyl that makes mixng an art, it's the music. and the music will be the main focus whether on vinyl or mp3
if its such an art, which ok maybe but so what, why do people get the best turntables with enhanced torque and various pitch ranges, and in some cases 'digital' displays like the Numark TTK.
As far as I am aware the Technic 1210 is the industry standard. Haven't ever seen any of thise digital display turntables you speak of in any clubs mate. Again, if you're talking about bedroom DJs then by all means, whatever you wanna do.
Hi ya people! New to this forum lark so bear with me.
Gonna hopefully be posting some mixes of mine for you's to enjoy under name of Emeate. All done with good old fashioned vinyl I might add on Numark TT500 + Behringer DJX750.It's not that I'm against the idea of mp3 and cdj's. It's just that I like the control and sound of vinyl more so.Anyone else agree?Opinions please
maybe so about the technics, but their have been updated. It was a crap point i made I know.
Dont you think that seeing the layout of a song the vinyl record is more of an advantage than a standard cdj can do. I think you me be assuming that all digital users use some sort of visual display of the song, use a bpm counter, auto sync and use just a laptop.
I use none of the features described which is considered cheating, I use two cdj turntables, with a rotating platter, everything is the same, i play and ride the pitch, touch it etc etc, nothing is missing from the visual aspect except for the way the turntable looks of course.