Inkognit
Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
icicle still uses logic 9 , dlr uses various daws and logic x isn't the main one...
1. Go to the masterclass thread
2. Watch DLR and Icicle most recent masterclasses
3. ???
4. Profit
icicle still uses logic 9 , dlr uses various daws and logic x isn't the main one...
1. Go to the masterclass thread
2. Watch DLR and Icicle most recent masterclasses
3. ???
4. Profit
Logic 9
https://www.facebook.com/dirtyleroi/videos/vb.559339230761365/1174416902586925/?type=3&theater logic 9, 17 November, more recent than this ?!
quite a few huh ?! lol
Two more besides this one... So, yep!
Two more besides this one... So, yep!
Check the masterclass thread, some good stuff!didn't see this, thanks btw !
I have been using Reason so logic is an Amazing step up. Also, Logic x.2 has even more capabilities than 9. You just need to switch it to Advanced, so it's less like garage band.
FL is an mazing DAW for elecronic production.. and don't get me wrong I am not saying you always get for what you pay, but a company that drops the price of a software by 750 euros means something imo..
ok Icicle switched then, DLR didn't as you can see from a 17th November video, still quite a few is pretty generous..shall I make a list of d&b producers using live, cubase, logic 9 or fl ? So again before laughing check the numbers
Why does it matter if a well know artist is using Logic 9 or Logic X? I know plenty of producers who swear by Logic X since they switched. IMO a daw shouldn't be measured by what artist endorses it but by what suits your workflow. It seems to me you like rubbishing Logic X because "pro" studios will not switch over or because so called dnb artists are using the older version. There are plenty of producers out there who use whatever they can afford and get there hands on who make good music, Logic X opens up a lot of possibilities to people who wouldnt have had the money to afford £700 production suite. Just because its not being used by X Y and Z production studios does not mean its any less better than another daw out there. Its a very elitist view to have.ok Icicle switched then, DLR didn't as you can see from a 17th November video, still quite a few is pretty generous..shall I make a list of d&b producers using live, cubase, logic 9 or fl ? So again before laughing check the numbers
Why does it matter if a well know artist is using Logic 9 or Logic X? I know plenty of producers who swear by Logic X since they switched. IMO a daw shouldn't be measured by what artist endorses it but by what suits your workflow. It seems to me you like rubbishing Logic X because "pro" studios will not switch over or because so called dnb artists are using the older version. There are plenty of producers out there who use whatever they can afford and get there hands on who make good music, Logic X opens up a lot of possibilities to people who wouldnt have had the money to afford £700 production suite. Just because its not being used by X Y and Z production studios does not mean its any less better than another daw out there. Its a very elitist view to have.
Also surely the numbers for Ableton are a lot more as people use that for DJ sets, therefore opening up another demographic and another whole new user base? Also the fact Ableton Live is both run on PC and Mac makes that user base bigger. PCs still outweigh mac user ship my a mile.
Those dates are just the time the video was posted surely, they could have been filmed ages ago tbf
Why does it matter if a well know artist is using Logic 9 or Logic X? I know plenty of producers who swear by Logic X since they switched. IMO a daw shouldn't be measured by what artist endorses it but by what suits your workflow. It seems to me you like rubbishing Logic X because "pro" studios will not switch over or because so called dnb artists are using the older version. There are plenty of producers out there who use whatever they can afford and get there hands on who make good music, Logic X opens up a lot of possibilities to people who wouldnt have had the money to afford £700 production suite. Just because its not being used by X Y and Z production studios does not mean its any less better than another daw out there. Its a very elitist view to have.
Also surely the numbers for Ableton are a lot more as people use that for DJ sets, therefore opening up another demographic and another whole new user base? Also the fact Ableton Live is both run on PC and Mac makes that user base bigger. PCs still outweigh mac user ship my a mile.
I kindly disagree. The answer to that question is: They can achieve exactly the same results and no one is better than the other, considering only the software. And that's why eveyone I see asking this question, I say to them: "download the demos and see the one that suit your workflow.". Basically this means: if you think Ableton suits your workflow, it means that it's a great daw TO YOU. But not for me, for example. It doesn't mean Ableton is better than FL, or Reason, or any other daw out there.I quote myself :
The common question : which daw should I go for ?
The answer is not they are all the same, the answer is you can do most of the things with most of them, then some daw are simply more effiient in doing some of the more advanced operations.
Have I said that one is better than another ?
The bold text says it all: "some are better than others".The answer is not they are all the same, the answer is you can do most of the things with most of them, then some daw are simply more effiient in doing some of the more advanced operations.
rubbishing ? lol Logic lost a lot of users from 9 to x, apple took 6 years to upgrade logic 9 cos their dedicated team was severely reduced...these are the facts man and all the pros know apple is no longer interested in that business.. and again about top daw I mean the ones with the biggest user base, these are the numbers... nobody said Logic X is a bad daw, don't be mad just becaus is the one you use
I kindly disagree. The answer to that question is: They can achieve exactly the same results and no one is better than the other, considering only the software. And that's why eveyone I see asking this question, I say to them: "download the demos and see the one that suit your workflow.". Basically this means: if you think Ableton suits your workflow, it means that it's a great daw TO YOU. But not for me, for example. It doesn't mean Ableton is better than FL, or Reason, or any other daw out there.
And, finishing by quoting yourself: The bold text says it all: "some are better than others".
Don't make assumptions, quite the contrary in actual fact. I switch between Live 9 , Cubase and Logic. I was a Certified in Logic 6 and 7. I use Logic X every now and then but my main Daw is Live. I just get fed up with the arrogant views. Pros this and Pros that. What makes some one a pro? It took Apple 4 years to update Logic X.
4 years it's still a lot of time, a pro is someone who makes a living out of a daw, if your main daw is Live there is a reason, right ? Oh and big ups about the certifications very useful to know
I kindly disagree. The answer to that question is: They can achieve exactly the same results and no one is better than the other, considering only the software. And that's why eveyone I see asking this question, I say to them: "download the demos and see the one that suit your workflow.". Basically this means: if you think Ableton suits your workflow, it means that it's a great daw TO YOU. But not for me, for example. It doesn't mean Ableton is better than FL, or Reason, or any other daw out there.
And, finishing by quoting yourself: The bold text says it all: "some are better than others".
rubbishing ? Logic lost a lot of users from 9 to x, apple took like 6 years to upgrade logic 9 cos their dedicated team was severely reduced...these are the facts man and all the pros know apple is no longer interested in that business.. and again about top daw I mean the ones with the biggest user base, these are the numbers... nobody said Logic X is a bad daw at all
Yes there is a reason my main Daw is Live, I found Live to be very good to be creative. There are many things I find i miss from Logic. The plugins. Apple is learning from Ableton, hence the way it looks etc. You have to remember that the main 3 Daws Cubase, Logic and Pro Tools have not strayed far too much from their origins. Live was written without those constraints hence the way the workflow is a hit with session and arrange. You now have Bitwig as well.4 years it's still a lot of time, a pro is someone who makes a living out of a daw, if your main daw is Live there is a reason, right ? Oh and big ups about the certifications very useful to know