DNBArena are really branching out..!

[Attire]

New favourite

I guess it's always nice to see some new blood on the scene.

 

[MARKLAR]

lol wtf

 

[skwiffer]

Come again? (I'm new to the forum, so am probably missing something ha)

 

[Longboa]

haha wtf

 

[jsmith89]

i bet they don't have half the tracks they advertise on their website. tried to buy love's theme, paid for it but said the file doesn't exist. took them a week to get back to me. so deviant advertising tracks they don't even have. never using it again

 

[evermind]

Yeah when I started buying music online I started with this store but I had quite a few bad experiences not using it again either... I mostly use itunes now, don't see why people hate it.

 

[DeeGun]

Probably because the mp3s are 256s and not 320s amirite
I use digital-tunes.net or the labels themselves, also a lotta "smaller" dealers.

 

[Harry3]

Probably because the mp3s are 256s and not 320s amirite

this

 

[evermind]

duh... itunes don't sell mp3 files it's a different format. The quality is just as good look at their spectra. (or maybe even better?)

itunes ->

trackitdown 320 ->

 

[DeeGun]

trackitdown 320 ->

why does it say itunes?

 

[Aidenrn]

What is the point of data above 20KHz if you can't even physically hear it? Surely the second is better as there is a flatter response overall. Also would have been a fairer test if you'd used the same song for both formats....

 

[DeeGun]

I would have clicked the thanks button but its gone

 

[evermind]

why does it say itunes?

because it is archived in my itunes folder... But you can see the extension is .mp3 whereas for the other its .m4a

would have been a fairer test if you'd used the same song for both formats....

yeah I'm sorry I don't buy the same song on itunes and on another site And it's the all itunes songs I tested had the same peaks...

What is the point of data above 20KHz if you can't even physically hear it? Surely the second is better as there is a flatter response overall.

Are you saying .mp3 is better than a .wav file then? I'm not an expert on that matter but I'd say .wav is better?

 

[d-low]

what the hell is going on here? Why are you comparing an african giraffe with an asian gorilla? What are you proving? Who has a qualification in this field?


What the fuck are you talking about? nobody even compared a WAV with an MP3, are you mental?!?!

 

[osmosis]

I would have clicked the thanks button but its gone

waaaaatt? wheres it gone?

 

[d-low]

because im so confused. im going to post a big giraffe to settle the matter.

 

[ThePapa]

 

[d-low]

 

[d-low]

infact i may have just found a new signature

 

[evermind]

What the fuck are you talking about? nobody even compared a WAV with an MP3, are you mental?!?!

no... He said mp3s are better than the itunes m4a because they don't have response above 20kHz (which .wav do).
Anyway the thread is pretty random