BPM Counter

Discussion in 'DJ's, MC's & Turntablism' started by B1aDe, Apr 8, 2008.

  1. B1aDe

    B1aDe Hear me now!

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Do people use these then and do they work??
     
  2. MARLZTAH

    MARLZTAH ++DuB PrOFesSoR++

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    London
    the are completely pointless when mixing dnb, all dnb is made at pretty much the same speed

    the only logical use i see for them is if you mix a genre like hiphop... some tracks can be made at 90bpm some could be 150bpm, and it would help to know roughly what speeds your tracks are before you try and mix them

    back to your original question.... do they work??

    ive never used a proper one but im guessing that they most probably dont unless your mixing something with a straight four to the floor beat... or they calculate the bpm by you manually tapping the tempo

    there are freeware bpm counters available on the net that work by tapping ;)
     
  3. B1aDe

    B1aDe Hear me now!

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cumbria
    Cool cheers for that mate
     
  4. Dustek

    Dustek Finished the PhD

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,914
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    London on the Wisla
    The mixmeister free software one works perfectly but its only helpful with mp3s (remember to double the speed it gives you. It counts dnb as being half as fast as it is. Perfectly apart from that). A slight difference in bpm makes a major difference in mixing so a good counter could be helpful if you can't match by ear. But you should be able to. Most software and hardware counters are shite.
     
  5. Greg P

    Greg P Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,174
    Likes Received:
    1
    And to answer the other part of the question, no - no professional DJ uses them...
     
  6. BDS

    BDS Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Ye Olde England
    4get them thyre shit
     
  7. B1aDe

    B1aDe Hear me now!

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cumbria
    roger that :-/
     
  8. Evil Empire

    Evil Empire So Cal Selecta

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Right Near Da Beach...Southern California U.S.A.
    I personally dont think they work and they dont lock, their never accurate, their good for getting you in the ballpark area of the pitch but other then that its prtty much just for looks. Some one told me one time that you mix with our ears not our eyes why would u want to watch a bpm counter and it kinda made sense.
     
  9. Dustek

    Dustek Finished the PhD

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    5,914
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    London on the Wisla
    Let me be clear on this issue, the Mixmeister BPM counter is accurate as fuck. The reading you get is the same as on the producers production software,
     
  10. Riisu

    Riisu Not the Preacher Man

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    226
    Location:
    Hornchurch
    the only plus point of these is when you get a tune and you might want to know the bpm.
    but i mean, most producers use the same bpm everytime they do a tune, so you always roughly know where to pitch it in relation to other tunes when you're mixing, eg

    dillinja - 172
    tc - 173
    almost all other producers go off around 174
    g dub/taxman/jayden/hazard - 175
    clipz/die - 176
    modified motion - 178
    hazard does a few at 180

    you get the idea.
    but as for using one when mixing, pointless. but as a bit of homework when you get your tunes, it can help i guess.
     
  11. sam the dnb man

    sam the dnb man Variation

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    10,438
    Likes Received:
    562
    Location:
    Feltham
    i do all mine at either 170 or 180 jus depend on what type of tune im making, sometimes i go as low as 155
     
  12. MARLZTAH

    MARLZTAH ++DuB PrOFesSoR++

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    London
    i made an experimental track at 20bpm before!!
     
  13. Greg P

    Greg P Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,174
    Likes Received:
    1
    Now there's an interesting post - I'd noticed Dillanja produces his tracks a little slower than most (always need to pitch his tunes up a bit more than otheres when mixing them), but it's good to see some numbers..

    Some are real real fast though - How F*cking fast was "Back to your roots" Friction & K-Tee mix?
     
  14. Riisu

    Riisu Not the Preacher Man

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    226
    Location:
    Hornchurch
    clocks in at 183bpm if i remember rightly.... stupidly fast for no good reason.
     
  15. Greg P

    Greg P Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,174
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah I thought it must've been right up there... Once or twice when I've mixed that tune into a set I've had to stray into the minus side of the pitch control.... weird

    Wonder why the hell they decided to go with that BPM? Perhaps because of the vocal sample? Seeing as most DJ's play their sets pitched up a few percent, if they were to record this at 174 or around there, and then people were to pitch it up 3-4% as they do with most other things the vocal (which is already quite high pitched) would sound too "pitched up" and squeeky... better just to record it at the tempo people will be playing it at anyway and stop the vocal sounding too high - this is purely my theory though!
     
  16. Deft_Sound

    Deft_Sound Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    BPM's are never to be used to DJ. You will never get anywhere if you use them for that purpose. They are lame. Stay away from BPM counters.
     
  17. Original Nuttah

    Original Nuttah They Call My Dad Machete

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    England, Gloucestershire.
    Back to your roots i had measured at 184 bpm but dont blame friction and k tee...

    jonny l original was 184bpm and friction and k tee when they made the remix didnt want to mess around with the vocals so they had to make there song exactly the same bpm but it dont matter cus in my mixes i just turn it down to match the other tunes...i think?

    i havnt bothered to calculate but distorted minds songs like old times where fast wernt they? like in the 180`s? can someone be calculate that for us?

    its weiredly interesting to know!!! :D
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2008
  18. Evil Empire

    Evil Empire So Cal Selecta

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Right Near Da Beach...Southern California U.S.A.
    ^^^ im pretty sure its 182..
    Im not positive, im just goin off memory..
     
  19. robhicks1

    robhicks1 Nuts about Zoo

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,530
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Southampton
    Ive always mixed using my ears and its the best way. When I got Traktor scratch it does have bpm counters and they are completely inaccurate lol.:teeth:
     
  20. DJ.usive

    DJ.usive Skratchaholik.

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    From what I've seen, a lot of BPM counters only go to 160-170, then get really confused when a track goes above there and try to tell you half tempo and full tempo at the same time.
    Use yer ears like!