hey @fanu
I like this video, truth telling, but what if someone was like "hey, I need some guidance, would you let me sit in the lab with you and learn some things that way?"
Despite not being a young producer I've found this video interesting; I've heard mention of reference tracks a lot, but have always struggled to make the connection of how I can tweak my approach to the original mix by listening to a reference track since the latter is processed in the master in ways I can't 'reverse process' in my mind, if that makes sense? I'm not going to commit any time to learning how to master when I feel like my mixdowns still have lightyears to progress, but trying to reference an unmastered mixdown to a professional mastered track just doesn't sound like it makes any sense to me. Is it just a case of trying to achieve the closest possible product to the reference track within the original mix constraints (in terms of levels and balance), or is a deeper understanding of where a master can take the sound of a mix required?
From what I've read and heard (please correct me if I'm wrong) mastering is like the icing on the cake, the final 10%, the mix is what counts as a decent master isn't possible without a solid mix.
I use a reference track as a benchmark to aim for. I chuck it in the project and adjust the level so that it and my own track are at the same volume. I could go on all day about how its useful in different ways; comparing levels, seeing how much sub bass I should aim for, looking in a spectrum analyser and working out why their drums stand out so well, how much high end sounds good.
It also helps sound creation too, if you want build a drum break or layer some hits what better way to check its good than by comparing it to a track that you know works. Same for sound design too.