Ok thanks for the info, seems to me that it doesn't quite add up. The 1000's seem to sound awful in comparison to the 400's, so i'll stick to getting the 400's. Plus I don't think I could get a profit for the MK1's for the price they are at, as the seller has already had trouble selling them to others at the same offer he gave me. But nice idea..
Still.. it does seem wierd how the 400's are better. The 1000 MK1's did come out after the 400's right? Infact, if someone would be as kind to write one out, I would really appreciate to see like a timeline of all the releases of the Pioneer CDJ's. I mean, I thought it was as simple as- the 400's came out, then the 800's, then the 900's, then the 1000's, and then the 2000's. But the specs of each of the decks just doesn't seem to make sense to me. Because if they were released in this order, then how come some of the newer models are worse than the previous models? It just doesn't seem logical to invest in a product that takes it back a step..